| |
Last additions |

Markarian's Chain367 viewsDate: 07/03/2011
Telescope: William Optics Zenithstar 110
Mount: EQ6
System: Hutech Focal Reducer 0,85X
Camera: Canon EOS 350Da with LPS clip filter
Exposure: 37X300 sec (3 hours) @ 800asa RAW + darks
Autoguiding: Mitsuboshi Off-Axis Guider with ALccd5 + PHD guiding
Treatment: Deepskystacker and Photoshop
Remarks: first light for the OAG. Great tool. Mar 08, 2011
|
|

Orion Nebula M42399 viewsDate: 30/01/2011
Telescope: William Optics Zenithstar 110
Mount: EQ6
System: Hutech Focal Reducer 0,85X
Camera: Canon EOS 350Da with LPS clip filter
Exposure: 28 min @ 800asa RAW + darks
Autoguiding: Vixen Guidescope with ALccd5 + PHD guiding
Treatment: Deepskystacker and Photoshop
Remarks: bad weather... Feb 05, 2011
|
|

Heart & Soul Nebulae in Cassiopeia366 viewsDate: 17/10/2010
Telescope: Contax Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f:4
Mount: EQ6
System:
Camera: Canon EOS 350Da with Astonomik 13nm h-alpha clip filter
Exposure: 17 X 480 sec @ 1600asa RAW + darks
Autoguiding: Vixen Guidescope with ALccd5 + PHD guiding
Treatment: Deepskystacker and Photoshop
Remarks: First attempt to shoot h-alpha with the modified eos 350da. Needs more exposure...Oct 22, 2010
|
|

Moon and Venus in the West.383 viewsCanon Eos 40d and Sigma 50-150mm at 50mmAug 20, 2010
|
|

| Category |
Albums |
Files |
 | Backyard Amateur AstronomyWe shall not cease from exploration And the end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we started And know the place for the first time. . . . T. S. Eliot
|
|
3 |
30 |

|
 | AstrophotographyBetween my 12 and 18 years astronomy was my passion. It was the start of my interest in photography. That's the reason that I became a professional photographer and now a photography dealer. That why I'm also interested in historical Astrophotography. After 20 years of occasional observing I took up again my passion. Necessity creates possibilities: discovering the unexepted possibilities of my equipment is a creative exploration of the mind. My professional life is very stressing but when looking to the stars the stress disappears. It's a source of energy. Not the scope is goal but observing as much as possible.
If you should have any comments of questions, don't hesitate to contact me: xavier@debeerst.com. Xavier Debeerst |
|
14 |
273 |

|
 | Historical AstrophotographyAstrophotography was one of the first photographic subjects. Photography needed to help astronomers to find answers to some basic questions: is there life on the Moon, how much stars are there and how big is the Universe.
In 2006 I organized a photo exhibition called "Who's afraid of the Dark?" with a lot of unique astrophotos.
In this section you can find a selection of this exhibition. |
|
3 |
13 |
|
Deep Sky or the photography of the invisible
|

|


|
|
Deep Sky or the photography of the invisible
We talk about real astrophotography in photo history when photos are more than just experiements. The start of astrophotography is situated in 1850 (Michael Maunder, the Photohistorian, 09/2005)
Photographers and astronomers of the 19th century were confronted with two restrictions when photographing stars: the low sensitivity of the Daguerreotype and the errors of the telescopes. Since the Earth turns around its axis it's almost as if the stars evolve round an imaginary point (the polar star). Take a look at the nice picture by J.R. Eyerman, 1950. These are 2 problems that modern amateur photographers still have to cope with.
The development of more sensitive emulsions was boosted under the influence of, amongst others, astronomers. The problems concerning the sensitivity of emulsions were solved with the discovery of the wet Collodium and more importantly the improvement of the dry Silver Bromide glass negatives (1874).
In the meantime telescopes and mounts were optimized for astrophotography. All self-respecting observatories installed special telescopes to experiment with the new inventions.
In 1880 the idea was launched to make a photographic star atlas. The Observatoire de Paris took the initiative. The Brothers Henry (Paul, 1818-1905; Prosper, 1848-1903) were important pioneers of this project. In the exhibition you can find an early phto by the Henry Brothers (1886). From a modern point of view this photo isn't that impressive, but in 1886 these photos were very revolutionary. 45 minutes of exposure time was no exception.
The clearest nebulas could now be photographed. It was the Scottish astronomer Isaac Roberts (1829-1904) who was the first to photograph the arms of the Andromeda nebula in 1888. The Andromeda nebula is the closest galaxy to ours.
From that point onwards the discovery of new objects was wide open. Later on it were the American observatories (Lick, Mount wilson and much later Mount Palomar) which took over from European observatories.
The European observatories, which were mostly located near big cities (f.i. Ukkel near Brussels), suffered more from light pollution and became less interesting.
Under impulse of the American photographer Edward Emerson Barnard (1858-1932), who made the first photographic atlas of the galaxy, more and more investments were made in the photography of weaker sky objects. Especially the photos of Mount Wilson were revolutionary. In the exhibition you can see several photos made by the Mount Wilson Observatory.
By 1954 Mount Palomar Observatory made a complete photographical star atlas. This Palomar Sky Survey is still used today.
5 files, last one added on Apr 10, 2006 Album viewed 61 times
|
|
|
Selonography
|

|


|
|
Selenography or the history of the Moon
Stars can only be seen at night.
Photographing astronomical objects is very closely connected with the genesis of photography itself.
In 1838, one year before the announcement of the discovery of photography, by the astronomer - politician Arago before the French parliament, the first picture of the moon was taken by Daguerre. Since the beginning of photography the medium was destined to play an important role in astronomy. Or was it vice versa?
What is the influence of astronomy in the development of photography? Photography was nearly simultaneously discovered by Fox Talbot (1800-1877) in England and Louis Mandé Daguerre in France. Both had relationships in the astronomical scene. Daguerre via Arago and Talbot via Herschel. John Herschel (1792-1871) played an important role in the development of the negative / positive procedure. Hence the hommage of Paul Cava to this important astronomer. Paul Cava is a modern American Photographer who makes photo collages based on historical images. His work can only be viewed on rare occasions in Europe.
Within the Astronomy there were diffirent questions which photography could give a clear answer on: How many stars are there, exact location of the stars, the mutual brightness ratio of the stars, do the Moon and the Sun have an atmosphere.
All over the world, Photographers , opticians and astronomers were trying to answer these questions.
Obviously, the moon was the first object to be photographed. Several moon atlases had already been published before, but there were contradictions between the different publications. Every time there was the problem of the right level of detail. Photography could give a clear answer to this problem.
Whether or not there was life on the moon could also been answered by photography. Even after the first clear photos of the Moon there was still doubt. See "Les terres du ciel", 1884 of Camile Flammarion. Two original Moonphotos (Woodburry types) were published in there. One of those by James Nasmyth was first published in his own book "The Moon considered as a planet". This moonphoto wasn't an original image but a photo of a crater model made out of plaster. For Camille Flammarion it still wasn't clear whether or not there was life on the Moon.
The rare magic image lantern slides of 1870 give a good illustration on the common world view of those days.
It's only because the vulgarisation of the Moon photos in the form of stereo views that the world view would evolve and that it would become clear that the Earth probably was the only inhabited planet. Within the thinking of that time this was an important evolution that was accelerated by astrophotography.
The idea for a detailed photographical map of the Moon was launched in 1887 in Paris. Moritz Loewy (1833-1907) and Pierre-Henri Puiseux (1855-1928) supported by Charles le Morvan (1865-1933) started this ambitious project in 1880. Between 1894 and 1909, about 500 observation nights and over a 1000 takes later the map of the Moon was published in Heliogravure. It took 15 years because only under exceptionally good circumstances ("seeing") the moon could be photographed. The takes were made with the special Coudé refractor of the Obeservatoire de Paris. A refractor with a diameter of 74cm and a focal distance of 15 meters! For this time and age a huge telescope of 6.000 kg.
In the exhibition we have the "Carte Photographique de la Lune" of 1914. This is an addition to the "Atlas Photographique de la Lune" of 1905. The Atlas was completed based upon unpublished images. The photographic Moon atlas of Puiseux, Loewy and le Morvan has become very rare. This is a unique opportunity to view these photographs outside of a museum.
The photographic Moon atlas remained a reference until 1970 when NASA needed a more detailed and more up-to-date Moon atlas to determine possible landing sites for the Apollo flights. Under supervision of the astronomer Kuiper the best moon photos worldwide were assembled. Amongst others, the ones from the Lick observatory were used.
With the uprising of space travel these atlasesl ost their importance. The Moon photos of the different manned and unmanned space flights are used now. See numerous examples in the exhibition.
The apotheosis and the ultimate proof of the absence of life on the Moon was delivered in 1969 with the first man on the Moon. Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong wrote history and provided some icons of Photography. The most well known is probably the portrait of Buzz Aldrin made by Neil Armstrong.
5 files, last one added on Apr 10, 2006 Album viewed 31 times
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
| EquipmentEquipment can never be a goal as such but is a priority to use the right equipment for observing and to take photos. It takes a lot of time and skills to find and match the right tools. In this part of the website you can see the results of this never ending search. |
|
| 316 files in 20 albums and 4 categories with 0 comments viewed 24,838 times |

Random files |

M.J. Newton, Galaxy138 viewsM.J. Newton, Galaxy
+/-1930, United States
Signed
Vintage silver print, Good.
Not mounted
25.7 X 18.7 cm
|
|

Double Cluster in Perseus (H & Chi Per) (Borg version)99 viewsDate: 14/10/2006
Lens: Borg 100mm Achr. + Hutech LPR + William Optics Minus Violet
System: prime focus
Camera: Canon EOS 300D
Exposure: 30 X 90 sec @ 1600asa
Autoguiding: No autoguiding
Treatment: DslrStar + DeepSkyStacker + Photoshop + NeatImage
Remarks: Compare this image with the Intes version of the Double Cluster. The Borg version was made under foggy conditions. I couldn't see the cluster in the finder scope. The filter combination does a great job. The CA is much better. Still the stars are to blue. It isn't an apo but a good achr.
|
|

Lunar eclipse of 3 March 200716 viewsDate: 03/03/2007
Lens: Borg 100mm achr
System: 2X teleconverter
Camera: Canon EOS 350D with the Hutech LPS Front Filter
Exposure:
Autoguiding: no autoguiding
Treatment: Photoshop
Remarks:
|
|

Omega Nebula M17 in Sagittarius28 viewsDate: 07/08/2010
Telescope: WO Megrez 72 f:6
Mount: Kenko Plasma B with FS2
System: Borg Focal Reducer 0,8X
Camera: Canon EOS 350Da
Exposure: 31 X 240 sec @ 800asa RAW
Autoguiding: Vixen Guidescope with ALccd5 + PHD guiding
Treatment: Deepskystacker and Photoshop
Remarks:
|
|

|
|